An investigation into the classroom talk of Iranian EFL novice vs. experienced teachers
This study investigates the classroom talk of Iranian EFL novice versus experienced teachers with emphasis on the quality of communicative features through a linguistic lens provided by the SETT (Self-Evaluation of Teacher Talk) framework and TTFS (Teacher Talk Functional Scale) checklist. In so doing, 10 intermediate-level classrooms running by five novice and five experienced teachers were observed, each case twice. Eight distinctive communicative features of TT emerged upon the initial analysis of database obtained from the audio-recordings of 20 class sessions, totaling 30 hours of naturally generated input. Subsequently, the audio-recorded materials were carefully transcribed and analyzed in correspondence with the observation data in an attempt to compare how novice and experienced teachers present their talk. The results indicated both novice and experienced teachers enact communicative aspects of classroom talk; however, the quality of presentation in the case of the experienced group was far better. This in turn highlights the importance of raising awareness regarding TT features in teacher training courses. New communicative aspects of teacher talk highlighted in this study, including the use of L1 and language gradation, would help define new research paths exploring the classroom discourse. Further research inspired by this study needs to explore other aspects of teacher-student interactions in various educational settings.
Akbari, R., & Tajik, L. (2012). Second-language teachers’ moral knowledge base: A comparison between experienced and less experienced, male and female practitioners. Journal of Moral Education, 41(1), 39-59.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Aşık, A., & Kuru Gönen, S. İ. (2016). Pre-service EFL teachers’ reported perceptions of their development through SETT experience. Classroom Discourse, 7(2), 164-183.
Doganay, A., & Ozturk, A. (2011). An Investigation of Experienced and Inexperienced Primary School Teachers' Teaching Process in Science and Technology Classes in Terms of Metacognitive Strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 1320-1325.
Ellis, R. (1985). A variable competence model of second language acquisition. IRAL, 23(1), 47-59.
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition 2nd Edition-Oxford applied linguistics. Oxford university press.
Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior.
Freitas, I. M., Jiménez, R., & Mellado, V. (2004). Solving physics problems: The conceptions and practice of an experienced teacher and an inexperienced teacher. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 113-13.
Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers' classroom behaviour: Novice and experienced ESL teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161-182.
Haydarova, S. Z. (2018). Communicative teacher talk in the English classroom. Theoretical & Applied Science, (10), 323-326.
Huan, F., & Wang, L. (2011). A Self-Evaluation of Classroom Language Used When Teaching Grammar. International Education Studies, 4(4), 170-174.
İnceçay, G. (2010). The role of teacher talk in young learners’ language process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 277-281.
Khany, R., & Malmir, B. (2017). The Development and Validation of an English Language Teacher Talk Functional Scale. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(2), 37-52.
Melnick, S. A., & Meister, D. G. (2008). A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers' concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 39-56.
Moskowitz, G. (1976). The classroom interaction of outstanding foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 9(2), 135-143.
Pande, M. H. (2019). Exploring self-evaluation of teacher talk (SETT) in the Indian ESL context with in-service teachers. Foretell, 38, 47-60.
Poorebrahim, F., Talebinejad, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2015). Constructive or obstructive features of teacher talk in Iranian EFL classes. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(4), 729-736.
Rahmani Doqaruni, V. (2017). Communication strategies in experienced vs. inexperienced teachers' talk: A sign of transformation in teacher cognition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 17-31.
Scherer, G. A., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign-language teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Sert, O. (2013). Integrating digital video analysis software into language teacher education: Insights from conversation analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 231-238.
Shamsipour, A., & Allami, H. (2012). Teacher Talk and Learner Involvement in EFL Classroom: The Case of Iranian Setting. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(11).
Stanley, P., & Stevenson, M. (2017). Making sense of not making sense: Novice English language teacher talk. Linguistics and Education, 38, 1-10.
Thornbury, S. (1996). Teachers research teacher talk. ELT journal, 50(4), 279-289.
Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language teaching research, 6(1), 3-23.
Walsh, S. (2003). Developing interactional awareness in the second language classroom through teacher self-evaluation. Language awareness, 12(2), 124-142.
Walsh, S. (2006a). Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT journal, 60(2), 133-141.
Walsh, S. (2006b). Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2020 chester bennington
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.